AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 240 OEM and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 156% (2000MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 240 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+412%
3.072 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R5 240 OEM
244
Arc A350
+1227%
3239
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon R5 240 OEM
105
Arc A350
+1310%
1481
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
