Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 310 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 310 OEM
0.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +1477%
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
160
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
7.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
TU116
Caicos XT (215-0804070)
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy