Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 310 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
56 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 310 OEM
0.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +91%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
160
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
7.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
GT200B
Caicos XT (215-0804070)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy