Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 310 OEM and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3936 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 310 OEM
0.28 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +4932%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2019
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
160
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
7.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
Vega 20
Caicos XT (215-0804070)
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy