Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 310 OEM and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 310 OEM
0.28 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +6264%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
160
Shading Units
3840
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
7.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
Navi 21
Caicos XT (215-0804070)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy