Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (36.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340 OEM +1435%
0.599 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
36.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GT218
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy