Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (36.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340 OEM +1231%
0.599 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
36.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
G96C
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy