Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 36.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340 OEM +11%
0.599 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
36.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
384
Shading Units
216
24
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GT200
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy