Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 215W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 36.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340 OEM +25%
0.599 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
36.80GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
215W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
R600
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy