Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +1600%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2020
Pirate Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
555 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GV100
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy