Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX +1502%
11.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
10GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
384
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
TU102
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy