Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +168%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
20
384
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Cayman
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy