Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
264 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM +311%
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
3
384
Shading Units
120
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV630
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy