CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
VS
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 185W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
+311%
2.842 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340X OEM
VS
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
24
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
88.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.842 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
710.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
65W
TDP
185W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
3
AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
4
AMD Radeon HD 7730 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
6
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
8
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD FirePro S9000
9
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
10
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 505 OEM
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy