Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +80%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2017
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
8
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Lexa
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy