Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 435 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 435 OEM
0.659 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +332%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2016
Release Date
Jul 2020
Arctic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
896
20
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
41.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hainan
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy