Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD FirePro M7740

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD FirePro M7740

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M7740 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock940MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
AMD FirePro M7740 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (54.14GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
FirePro M7740 +15%
0.832 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Aug 2009
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
940 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
846 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
54.14GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
832.0 GFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
M97
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
M97XT-GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy