Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock940MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255 +1260%
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Mar 2010
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
940 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
384
Shading Units
24
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.80 GFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
GT216
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy