Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (1560MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile +1229%
9.585 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Apr 2020
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.585 TFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
TU104
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
N18E-G3
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy