Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M320 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

AMD Radeon R5 M320 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R5 M320 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M320 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 139% (2040MHz vs 855MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M320
0.547 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6300M +472%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Gem System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

780 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
855 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
32bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
17.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
547.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Jet
GPU Name
Navi 24
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy