Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900 +23%
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy