Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +445%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Sep 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1600
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy