Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro W5000

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro W5000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000 +153%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy