Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs NVIDIA PG506 242

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1440MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +1968%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
320
Shading Units
3584
20
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy