Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1410MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +2431%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
320
Shading Units
4480
20
TMUs
280
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GA100
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy