Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro S7000

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro S7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000 +387%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1280
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy