Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 129% (1785MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630 +266%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1740 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
320
Shading Units
512
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
TU117
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy