AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro S7150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
+655%
3.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
20
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Tonga
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
