Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1019MHz vs 780MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690 +527%
3.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1536
20
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GK104
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy