Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R7 350X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1050MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350X OEM +61%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
6
320
Shading Units
384
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Oland
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy