AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
304 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+907%
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
80
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Cedar
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
