Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (2331MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +344%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
12
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 24
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy