AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+4%
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
