AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+3930%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300 GE
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
8
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
G98
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
