AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 7500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 119% (2300MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7500 XT
+1068%
9.421 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1452 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2300 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.60 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
147.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.84 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.421 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
294.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Navi 33
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Navi 33
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
