AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+139%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GT
0.336 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jul 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
112
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
G92B
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
G92-280-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
