AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+1966%
0.806 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GT218
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
