Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA P104 101

AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA P104 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 4GB VRAM P104 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)
NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1683MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.3GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
P104 101 +969%
8.617 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2018
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.7 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
269.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
134.6 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.617 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
269.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GP104
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
GP104-101-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy