AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2004
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
12
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
NV41
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0
