Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 9070

AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 9070

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 9070 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 140% (2520MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 9070 +4382%
36.13 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2025
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1330 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
112
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
322.6 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
564.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
72.25 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
36.13 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1129 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 48
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT (215-176600331)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net