AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 65W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
44W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
RV535
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0
