AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 143% (2550MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
12416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+7999%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
100
384
Shading Units
12800
24
TMUs
400
8
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
AD102
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
