AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 114% (2250MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+2758%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
384
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
AD104
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
