AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 96GB VRAM RTX PRO 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 600W)
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 129% (2407MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
23680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
RTX PRO 6000
+14267%
115.8 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2025
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Blackwell PRO
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
2017 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
96GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1.79TB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
188
384
Shading Units
24064
24
TMUs
752
8
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
752
-
RT Cores
188
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
423.6 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1810 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
115.8 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
115.8 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.810 TFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
600W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GB202
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
92.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
750 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
10.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
