Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +571%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
DG2-128
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy