Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +606%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Hawaii
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy