Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD FirePro W7000

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000 +239%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
20
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy