CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
AMD Radeon R7 250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
296 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
+33%
0.717 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
GT200
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
55W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs ATI Radeon X800 GT AGP
2
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
3
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
4
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 250
5
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
6
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
7
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon HD 7720 OEM
8
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
9
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 550 512SP
10
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
2
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
3
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
4
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
5
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
6
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
7
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
8
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
9
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
10
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy