Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
296 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 +33%
0.717 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GT200
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy