Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA P106 090

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA P106 090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
P106 090 +228%
2.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jul 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GP106
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy