Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +74%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Lexa
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy